--part1_732456a1.24a8f09d_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In a message dated 6/28/99 8:31:51 AM Pacific Daylight Time, YOTRACR writes:
<< parameters. it was my understanding many years ago that the olson 30 was
accepted in phrf as a one design by the one design specs. for example, j-24,
melges, t-birds...all have a standard rating based on thier respective one
design class rules.
i do not think the olson is any different, nor should it be changed. if we
need to clarify this a call to the phrf authorities should settle this.
cheers
bob pistay
ooops, john could you forward this to the list...hit the wrong reply button
bob >>
--part1_732456a1.24a8f09d_boundary
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline
Return-path: YOTRACR@aol.com
From: YOTRACR@aol.com
Full-name: YOTRACR
Message-ID: <732456a1.24a8ef67@aol.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 11:31:51 EDT
Subject: Re: Spinnaker Measurement
To: HoagJD@email.msn.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 4
for what its worth, traditionally phrf has usually conformed to a one
design's parameters. it was my understanding many years ago that the olson 30
was accepted in phrf as a one design by the one design specs. for example,
j-24, melges, t-birds...all have a standard rating based on thier respective
one design class rules.
i do not think the olson is any different, nor should it be changed. if we
need to clarify this a call to the phrf authorities should settle this.
cheers
bob pistay
ooops, john could you forward this to the list...hit the wrong reply button
bob
--part1_732456a1.24a8f09d_boundary--
Received on Mon Jun 28 08:38:49 1999